Conflicts of interest are a kind of conflict interest. We can define a conflict of interest as a situation in which a person has a sufficient private or personal interest to influence the objective performance of his or her official duties in. B as a public servant, employee or professional. “Social conflict is not limited to hostile or antagonistic opposition; This is not quite a power struggle of coercion, as is often the case, but opposite social powers. Social conflicts are generally recognized by violence and physical behaviour. But it`s not just about fighting and killing each other. Sometimes it can manage to throw a simple city into a conversation. It is recognized by the power of a human being. [This quote requires a quotation] As Table 27.1 shows, in addition to exchanges and coercion, there are many ways to resolve conflicts. However, for either reason, they may be undesirable or impractical. You can then give up the interest. If success does not seem to be worth the cost, x can be left to the other person. On the other hand, we can resort to naked violence. If, for example, the work of persuasion, negotiation and threats of war do not put an end to a border conflict, the area can be conquered militarily.
While the balance of coercive powers and balances does not necessarily imply violence (you are told of the complexity of daily social behaviour, known as conduct, regulated by the coercive power of the state, without violence), the deliberate use of force is generally the result of this compensation or a breakdown of a coercive balance. Social conflict is a commitment of oneself. Violence, which is directed only against objects or bodies, is not social. To the extent that violence is a means of forcing another, it is a manifestation of social conflict.5 Non-violent action is an important technique for carrying out social, economic and political conflicts without the use of physical force. Nonviolent action is an old technique that seems to become increasingly important in conflicts in different parts of the world in recent decades. Sears and Cairns point out that the big banks and corporations then received bailout funds from the same governments who said they did not have enough funds for major social programs such as general health care. This dichotomy supports a fundamental assumption of conflict theory, which states that mainstream political institutions and cultural practices favour dominant groups and individuals. As a phenomenon, human violence is therefore not fundamentally clear; Whether it is reflexive behaviour, physical strength or coercion, whether social or non-social conflicts, only the associated field of expression can be determined by assessing intentionality. The slaves certainly wanted less work and a better standard of living provided by their masters, while interest was direct for more work and less spending for slaves – the reversal of the former.
